<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;Minor crap factoid spotted: &amp;amp;quot;nearly half consider ITIL very critical to achieving their goals&amp;amp;quot; &quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/539</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Minor crap factoid spotted: &quot;nearly half consider ITIL very critical to achieving their goals&quot; &quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>the ITIL Detective</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/539#comment-2687</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Antonio, you are the ITIL Detective!  A second great discovery, following on from the Disappearing 1.1.1.   I&#039;m rather glad they put that back in.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 19:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2687 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A new finding in the books!</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/539#comment-2685</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve been reading carefully the official introduction to the service lifecycle book and I&#039;ve found another little pearl in the contents:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On page 13,first paragraph of section 2.7 it says: &quot;An important aspect of ITIL is the &#039;open-source&#039; nature of its practices&quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Great, isn&#039;t it? :-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>avallesalas</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2685 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Typo.....</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/539#comment-2680</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The typo is mine..not the books.  &quot;Publicly AVAILABLE frameworks....&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>LizB</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2680 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Public Domain</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/539#comment-2679</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Well, in the V3 books, section 1.2.2 talks about &quot;Good practice in the public domain&quot;.  Once you read past the stuff about good practice being good, it says &quot;publicly frameworks and standards such as ITIL, COBIT, CMMI, eSCM-SP, PRINCE2, ISO 9000, ISO/IEC 20000, AND ISO/IEC 27001 are validated acrtoss a diverse set of environments and situations.....&quot; and on and on.  It goes further to say &quot;ignoring public frameworks and standards can needlessly place an organization at a disadvantage&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, I take it it&#039;s back in the public domain...at least for now...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Liz&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>LizB</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2679 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL concepts are in the public domain?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/539#comment-2678</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;By the way, if Computerworld think ITIL concepts are in the public domain, how do they explain OGC quietly &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/219&quot;&gt;disappearing section 1.1.1&lt;/a&gt; of the ITIL V2 books?  I can&#039;t check the V3 books (I don&#039;t have them here with me in Amsterdam).   Anybody help?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 07:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2678 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
