<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;Big Uncle: ceding privacy for security in our daily lives&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/559</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Big Uncle: ceding privacy for security in our daily lives&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Privacy vs looting rioters</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/559#comment-8386</link>
 <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;RIM issued a statement saying it will comply with the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, &quot;and co-operate fully with the Home Office and UK police forces&quot; [to track down rioters using Blackberries to coordinate attacks]  RIPA is a much-criticised piece of legislation that allows for the surveillance and investigation of communications data and user accounts if the Home Secretary (or a senior police officer, depending on the data required) deems it necessary for crime fighting purposes. It&#039;s often been slated as a snooper&#039;s charter. But I think even hardened privacy advocates might, this time, be happy to see it harnessed to bring the violent looters who have sullied London to heel.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/onepercent/2011/08/as-a-species-we-are.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;New Scientist&lt;/a&gt; (not noted for its right-wing views)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wanna have a bet on how many of those Blackberries turn out to be stolen?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8386 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
