<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;Sad news: I&amp;amp;#039;ve been ripped off by a major vendor&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/646</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Sad news: I&#039;ve been ripped off by a major vendor&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>the gist </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/646#comment-3060</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks.  I was pretty mad at the other offender and it washed over onto yours so you probably copped more than deserved.  The other one was a ripoff pure and simple whereas the mash-up site is just quoting much too much of the articles before linking.  This happens all the time but I don&#039;t think it makes it OK: quote so much, over half,  that you have the gist and don&#039;t need to go there but they pretend it was &quot;just a quote and link&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 20:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3060 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>My bad</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/646#comment-3057</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi there,&lt;br /&gt;
I was just looking in the weblogs of that site and came across your posting.  The content in question was put up so visitors could go directly to your article because it was quite interesting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The website hasnt been updated in over a year and it never will.  I am trying to get it taken down at the moment.  The site was originally put together to rival the likes of tool selector, etc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Many apologies for upsetting you.  That was never the purpose.  Like I said before the site is coming down as soon as possible.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3057 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>a minor irritant</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/646#comment-2981</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t have a problem with being in it for the money - I&#039;m trying to make  a living off this stuff myself.  As i&#039;ve said before if you want to change the world work for UNESCO or Red Cross.  I also don&#039;t have a problem with (legal) SEO techniques - I use &#039;em myself.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, like you I have little respect for mash-ups - sites that don&#039;t create content just recycle it.  They are everywhere in the internet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just to be clear, that mashuip site is a minor irritant.   The incident I&#039;m talking about was unrelated to that content or that site, and involved a commercial site not a mashup (and nothing to do with Ian Clayton BTW, we remain good friends)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 20:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2981 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I have been suspicious</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/646#comment-2980</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I have been suspicious of &quot;ITIL&quot;/&quot;ITSM&quot; &quot;gateway&quot; sites for a good many years, since repeatedly discovering sites with very little content but linking to each other (one of the old techniques for increasing ranking, I believe). There are clearly a fair number of players in the industry who are just in it for money, which is quite depressing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stealing other people&#039;s content is fortunately something I&#039;ve seen less often ... but it&#039;s still depressing.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 12:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>JoePearson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2980 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>sex politics and sport are prohibited </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/646#comment-2975</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;sex politics and sport are prohibited on this blog, except when I get politically wound up occasionally :-D&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;actually, recall that i don&#039;t consume any popular media so i really don&#039;t know how they are doing!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 04:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2975 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The story behind Chokey???</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/646#comment-2971</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;BTW, skep, what is the story behind Chokey???&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I thought it was the mascot for the All Black&#039;s world cup team?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Red Pineapple</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2971 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>the laziest form of theft</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/646#comment-2967</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The fact is nobody looks out for us but ourselves.  I encourage everyone who publishes content to devote a little time each month to policing it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Even dear old Google is effective: spot an unusual turn of phrase in your work, quotate it and google it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are free tools on the web.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Or if you can afford it then look to firms that provide a commercial solution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I hate digital piracy.  It is the laziest form of theft.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 21:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2967 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Very sad</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/646#comment-2966</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry that this happened, but kudos to you for being &quot;on it.&quot; The internet age has opened up a lot of questions about copyright, and it is important that we all be vigilant to protect the integrity of original content.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Leah</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2966 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Sad, very sad</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/646#comment-2965</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Journalistic standards and rules should apply.  Heck, what happened to simple respect and aknowledgement for another&#039;s ideas.  The very least they could have done was include the links to make it look like a decent rip off!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All I know for me personally is that as a result, I will be skeptical as to the accuracy or relevance of any of the *#!* this website puts up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maybe it&#039;s really just run by Chokey&#039;s arch enemy or something...........&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ITIL citizen</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2965 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
