The IT Skeptic - Comments for "itSMFUSA declares who it thinks was Julie Linden"

this isn't an example of a little hotheadedness

skeptic — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:31:00 +0000

If you check out the original allegations, this isn't an example of a little hotheadedness.
http://www.itskeptic.org/node/167#comment-800
http://www.itskeptic.org/node/167#comment-806
http://www.itskeptic.org/node/167#comment-832

Either Julie Linden was whistleblowing some nasty stuff going on with the voting, or he/she was fabricating a hoax. Either way he/she seemed to be trying to bring down itSMFUSA's Board. Either way it backfired. If I was the Board I might do the same.

I'm hoping they have also established to their satisfaction who actually diddled the votes - my concern is that it might get lost in the melee.

There is all sorts of stuff going on in the background here: this is the tip above the surface, and it just happens to be the bit done on my blog.

Reflects poorly

ITIL citizen — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:31:20 +0000

This attitude reflects poorly on the professionalism the organization should be striving to maintain.

I agree with pineapple, this is the 21st century and blogs will be blogs............

I suppose a cup of tea is out of the question?

Red Pineapple — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:07:09 +0000

Why don't these guys sort things out over a pint? and I suppose a cup of tea is out of the question?

Seriously, a blog is always taken with a pinch of salt and does it warrant this type of action. I have seen worse on other blogs, with no lawyers involved!