<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - risk</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/146/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Who owns the risk of an IT change?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/who-owns-risk-it-change</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Stuart Rance posted an interesting blog about &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.sysaid.com/blog/entry/what-is-change-management-for&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;What Is Change Management For?&lt;/a&gt;.  Then we had an excellent &lt;a href=&quot;https://plus.google.com/+StuartRance/posts/3Gxi2iwBTUB&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;discussion about it on Google+&lt;/a&gt;, where some great stuff came up that I want to capture here in my IP repository (or &quot;blog&quot; for short).  Tell me what you think:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/who-owns-risk-it-change&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/who-owns-risk-it-change#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/153">change</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/118">ITSM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/146">risk</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2362</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2014 02:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2362 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Risk taking</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/risk-taking</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In the last few decades it has become fashionable to adopt a higher risk profile in pursuit of flexibility, agility, competitiveness and ultimately higher profits.  We are told by the experts that risk can be managed, mitigated, hedged.  We all know how well that turned out for the financial industry in the 1980s, again in the 1990s, and again in the 2000s.  Are we learning yet?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The hard fact about a higher risk profile is that sooner or later you will crash.  Just because you got away with it last time doesn&#039;t mean you will next time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We all tut tut about those evil bankers, and then we go and do it in IT.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/risk-taking&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/risk-taking#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/146">risk</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2114</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 09:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2114 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Note to devops; smaller changes do not equate to less risk</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/note-devops-smaller-changes-do-not-equate-less-risk</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;To say smaller frequent changes  are less risky is a dangerous fallacy. &lt;a href=&quot;http://clicktotweet.com/5H097&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; style=&quot;color:red&quot;&gt;Tweet this&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/note-devops-smaller-changes-do-not-equate-less-risk&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/note-devops-smaller-changes-do-not-equate-less-risk#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/devops">devops</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/146">risk</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2193</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 00:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2193 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Knight Capital makes the point about the risks of automation</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/knight-capital-makes-point-about-risks-automation</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Knight Capital&#039;s disaster is a warning to us all in IT&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/knight-capital-makes-point-about-risks-automation&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/knight-capital-makes-point-about-risks-automation#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/automation">automation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/146">risk</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2166</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 06:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2166 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL Problem versus Risk</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-problem-versus-risk</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It was one of the great ITSM philosophers, Jan van Bon who first explained to me that Problem Management is but a special case of Risk Management.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a purist theoretical sense he is right, but on a practical level I think the distinction is useful.  It is certainly entrenched.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-problem-versus-risk&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-problem-versus-risk#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/157">problem</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/146">risk</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1307</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 08:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1307 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Contingency planning</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1071</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;As the recession deepens, perhaps we need to lighten up some and make sure we don&#039;t over-spend on risk mitigation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1071&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1071#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/158">Realitsm</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/146">risk</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1071</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1071 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Risk Management - the lost process of ITIL V3</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/640</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Is Risk Management the &quot;lost process&quot; of ITIL V3?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/640&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/640#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/146">risk</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/640</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 06:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">640 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
