<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - operations</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/162/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>An important DevOps word: toolmakers</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/important-devops-word-toolmakers</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&#039;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/itskeptic/imagepicker/1/tool_maker_canstockphoto10503710.jpg&#039; title=&#039;© Copyright CanstockPhoto.com&#039; style=&quot;float: right&quot; class=&#039;imgp_img&#039; height=&#039;100&#039; /&gt;The word &quot;toolmaker&quot; has great explanatory power to help IT people understand how their world is changing.  Those who come from the Run domain of IT (as compared to Build) are becoming toolsmiths.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/important-devops-word-toolmakers&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/important-devops-word-toolmakers#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/automation">automation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/devops">devops</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/162">operations</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2474</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2015 23:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2474 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Who owns the system during the go-live warranty period?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/who-owns-system-during-go-live-warranty-period</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Transitioning a project into Production is a complex process.  One of the trickiest parts is transitioning responsibilities.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Go-live&quot; is sometimes seen too simplistically as a handover to Operations, as if Ops will magically run it from Day One without help.  Or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/define-devops&quot;&gt;DevOps&lt;/a&gt; sees it the opposite way, where Operations plays a minor role forever.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There needs to be a transitional phase.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/who-owns-system-during-go-live-warranty-period&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/who-owns-system-during-go-live-warranty-period#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/devops">devops</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/162">operations</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/production">production</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/264">readiness</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/service-transition">Service Transition</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2371</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2015 23:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2371 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How Operational Readiness should be done</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/how-operational-readiness-should-be-done</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/operational-readiness&quot;&gt;written before about Dead Cat Syndrome&lt;/a&gt; and the importance of having a specific Operational Readiness function (i.e people).  I saw this at a  client site:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/how-operational-readiness-should-be-done&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/how-operational-readiness-should-be-done#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/162">operations</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/264">readiness</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2388</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2014 11:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2388 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>IT operations must beware inappropriate automation</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/it-operations-must-beware-inappropriate-automation</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Being technical folk, we are far to quick to leap to technical solutions to non-technical problems.  Automating operations tasks is one of those cases.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/it-operations-must-beware-inappropriate-automation&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/it-operations-must-beware-inappropriate-automation#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/automation">automation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/162">operations</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2032</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2032 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Operational Readiness</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/operational-readiness</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;There is a whole activity or function or ITIL-would-say process that gets neglected: Operational Readiness.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/operational-readiness&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/operational-readiness#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/162">operations</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/264">readiness</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2001</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 23:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2001 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Virtualization: the black box bomb</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/virtualization-black-box-bomb</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It lurks in the corner of many data centres these days.  Actually, no, it used to lurk in the corner.  Now it lurks on a virtual server.  If it don&#039;t start we&#039;re screwed.  What is it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/virtualization-black-box-bomb&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/virtualization-black-box-bomb#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/162">operations</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/205">virtualization</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1292</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 07:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1292 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cutting the cost of IT Operations</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/cutting-cost-it-operations</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Once Development was the epicenter of IT, then Operations was. Now it is Service. Soon it will be Governance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Operations is a commoditised domain now: people increasingly buy on price. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/cutting-cost-it-operations&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/cutting-cost-it-operations#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/162">operations</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1471</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 20:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1471 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Operating the Cloud: the people and process questions</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/operating-cloud-people-and-process-questions</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Cloud computing is a popular topic right now. Some see it as a saviour technology for cost cutting but there is too much thought given to how you will connect at a technical level with a Cloud service provider. Just as important is how you will connect at a process level and at a business level.  IT development and solutions staff are prone to waving these considerations away as an issue for the operations people and the “suits”, but the process and business considerations are more important than the technical ones. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/operating-cloud-people-and-process-questions&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/operating-cloud-people-and-process-questions#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cloud">cloud</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/162">operations</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/185">SaaS</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1429</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 21:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1429 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>5 questions for John M. Willis</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/5-questions-john-m-willis</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;John M. Willis, a.k.a. Botchagalupe, or possibly a close associate of Botchagalupe, asked me to answer five questions &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.johnmwillis.com/itil/5-questions-for-the-itskeptic/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;which he posted on his blog&lt;/a&gt;, and to ask five questions in return.  Here are my five questions for John.  He works on Tivoli with Big Blue but if you can get past the vendor thing :-D John is a battle-scarred warrior of IT operations with a suitably hard-bitten view of the world that aligns well with my skeptical outlook.  Enjoy his responses:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/5-questions-john-m-willis&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/5-questions-john-m-willis#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/18">open source</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/162">operations</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1215</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1215 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Open source systems management tools: an informal directory</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/open-source-systems-management-tools-informal-dire</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Operations is a commoditised domain now: people buy on price. Antivirus is a commodity. So is backup. So is much of the hardware. Watch what open source software does to systems and network management, media management and a bunch of other software types. CIOs want to spend their money on an ITIL project, ISO20000 certification, SOX compliance, COBIT audit, Project Management Office, CMDB, and a Balanced Scorecard Dashboard. Funds for IT Operations are limited: it is all about cutting costs now, or soon will be.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;[Update: This directory is now maintained as part of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ops4less.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Ops4Less&lt;/a&gt;  This page will no longer be updated]&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/open-source-systems-management-tools-informal-dire&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/open-source-systems-management-tools-informal-dire#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/18">open source</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/162">operations</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1168</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 02:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1168 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The most important IT monitoring tools are those that measure the end user experience</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/626</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It has always seemed to me that most IT monitoring and measuring tools are very self-serving.  They look at the world from the internal IT silo perspective.  In ITSM terms they are mildly interesting diagnostic tools for incident and problem resolution, but in terms of service level measurement the only really useful tools are the ones that measure the end user experience.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/626&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/626#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/161">monitoring</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/162">operations</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/23">SLA</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/626</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">626 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
