<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - 2011</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/270/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>ITIL 2011 persists with the dangerous concept of supporting services</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-2011-persists-dangerous-concept-supporting-se</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Not only has ITIL V3.1 2011 not fixed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-services-are-customer-facing-whatever-catalog&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;the problems with business-vs-technical services&lt;/a&gt;, they have gone the wrong way and reinforced the problem.  I will fight to the death to say there is no such thing as internal supporting &quot;services&quot;, because I care about ITSM.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-2011-persists-dangerous-concept-supporting-se&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-2011-persists-dangerous-concept-supporting-se#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/270">2011</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/122">catalogue</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/186">service</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2070</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 20:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2070 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>My how ITIL has grown: the size of the new ITIL V3 2011</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/my-how-itil-has-grown-size-new-itil-v3-2011</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;We have more news on ITIL &lt;strike&gt;V3.1&lt;/strike&gt; V3 &quot;2011 Edition&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itsmfi.org/content/itil-2011-book-details-tso&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;from itSMF International&lt;/a&gt;.  Of most note is the extraordinary increase in the size of ITIL.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/my-how-itil-has-grown-size-new-itil-v3-2011&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/my-how-itil-has-grown-size-new-itil-v3-2011#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/270">2011</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2049</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2049 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL V3 2011: a new book and four new processes</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-2011-new-book-and-four-new-processes</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Let&#039;s discuss the only information we have about the upcoming ITIL V3 2011: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.best-management-practice.com/gempdf/ITIL_UPdate_FAQs_Summer_2011_June11.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;this FAQ&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-2011-new-book-and-four-new-processes&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-2011-new-book-and-four-new-processes#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/270">2011</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2042</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 11:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2042 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why ITIL V3 2011 matters and how OGC, TSO and APMG aren&#039;t helping</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/why-itil-v3-2011-matters-and-how-ogc-tso-and-apmg-</link>
 <description>&lt;div style=&quot;float: left; padding:1em;&quot;  &gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/imagepicker/1/thumbs/castle_canstockphoto0347456.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Image&quot; /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;small&gt;© canstockphoto.com &lt;/small&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On July 29 2011 we will get the update to ITIL V3.  There are calls for us to just relax and stop worrying about ITIL V3 2011.  Those unconcerned by changes to ITIL are those immersed in it: the experts, the consultants, the trainers. The other million users of ITIL can&#039;t keep track of all the differences between V2, V3, and V3 2011. They don&#039;t have the time or the interest (or the means).  Right now they are confused and uncertain.  And Castle ITIL aren&#039;t helping.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/why-itil-v3-2011-matters-and-how-ogc-tso-and-apmg-&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/why-itil-v3-2011-matters-and-how-ogc-tso-and-apmg-#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/270">2011</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2043</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2043 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
