<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Service Design</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/66/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>SD 4.6.4.3 five or six elements?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/sd-4643-five-or-six-elements</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Page 143 mentions the five elements within the framework are as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However the book actually mentions 6:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1.       Control&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2.       Plan&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3.       Implement&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4.       Evaluation (should be evaluate – see figure 4.26)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5.       Maintain&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6.       Security governance&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This would make the ISMS (figure 4.26) either incomplete or wrong&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/sd-4643-five-or-six-elements#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/66">Service Design</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/78">Inconsistent within book</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1710</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1710 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>SD 4.6.4.2 what is ITP?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/sd-4642-what-itp</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Page 142 uses the acronym ITP  - I&#039;m sure they mean ISP&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/sd-4642-what-itp#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/66">Service Design</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/77">Typographical</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1709</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1709 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Supplier strategy &amp; policy undefined in ITIL V3 Service Strategy</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/supplier-strategy-policy-undefined-itil-v3-service</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Service Design 4.7.6.1 p 162 requires a Supplier Strategy &amp;amp; Policy from Service Strategy. Service Strategy does not mention anything with regard to this. The glossary does not define any of these two terms.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Again a cross book omission. Great, I just wanted to write a few things on the Supplier Strategy and now I am out of references (ISO 20000 does not help here, CobiT neither). OK, again I will use my common sense.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/supplier-strategy-policy-undefined-itil-v3-service#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/66">Service Design</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/63">Service Strategy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/104">Omission</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1492</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 14:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mbuzina</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1492 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>SD p31 PM and warranty</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/sd-p31-pm-and-warranty</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The diagram on p31 is just wrong.  It shows the project team&#039;s job is done at the start of the pilot or warranty period.  This is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.projectmanagerplanet.com/leadership/article.php/3704476&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&quot;dead cat syndrome&quot; &lt;/a&gt; which must be avoided at all costs.   A project team should retain ownership through the warranty period until acceptance has been signed off.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/sd-p31-pm-and-warranty#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/66">Service Design</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/82">Not best practice</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1128</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 00:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1128 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>SD p101: MTBF</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/706</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Not considering that there is quite a lot of discussion about the usage of the acronyms MTBF, MTTF, MTRS and so on, this is simply wrong (or at least inconsistant):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;MTBSI = Available time in hours / Number of breaks&lt;br /&gt;
MTBF = (Available time in hours - Total downtime in hours) / Number of breaks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Available time to my understanding is the time the service is up and running properly. Some people call it &quot;uptime&quot;, though that is easily confused with the moment in time the service comes up. So it should be:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Available time in hours = uptime = Total time - downtime&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hence:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/706&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/706#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/66">Service Design</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/107">Just plain wrong</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/706</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>HAZET</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">706 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>SD p291 Glossary: Brainstorming</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/498</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Under the glossaery definition for ‘Brainstorming’ change the words ‘Service Operation’ to ‘Service Design’&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/498#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/66">Service Design</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/111">confirmed in BOK database</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/107">Just plain wrong</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/498</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">498 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>SD p214 ‘Service Transition Pack’ changed to ‘Service Design Pack’</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/497</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;214&lt;br /&gt;
8.5.1 Prerequisities for success&lt;br /&gt;
In left hand column, 4th line from bottom, ‘Service Transition Pack’ changed to ‘Service Design Pack’&lt;br /&gt;
214&lt;br /&gt;
8.5.2 Critical Success Factors…&lt;br /&gt;
In penultimate bullet point on page, ‘Service Transition Pack’ changed to ‘Service Design Pack’&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/497#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/66">Service Design</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/111">confirmed in BOK database</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/107">Just plain wrong</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/497</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">497 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>SD p147,148 change SMIS to ISMS</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/496</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;147&lt;br /&gt;
4.6.6.2 Outputs&lt;br /&gt;
2nd bullet point changed to ‘An Information Security Management System (ISMS)’&lt;br /&gt;
148&lt;br /&gt;
4.6.8 Information Management&lt;br /&gt;
3 instances of SMIS changed to ISMS&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/496#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/66">Service Design</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/79">Inconsistent between books</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/111">confirmed in BOK database</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/496</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">496 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>SD p145 Figure 4.27</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/495</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In Figure 4.27, bold text on left hand side of figure changed to ‘Information Security Management System (ISMS)’.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/495#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/66">Service Design</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/111">confirmed in BOK database</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/107">Just plain wrong</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/495</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">495 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>SD p79 ‘Catalogue’ replaced with ‘Level’</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/494</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In first sentence on the page, replace ‘Service Catalogue Management’ with ‘Service Level Management’&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/494#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/66">Service Design</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/111">confirmed in BOK database</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/107">Just plain wrong</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/494</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">494 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>SD p35 changed bullet point</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/493</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In last bullet list before section 3.6.3, penultimate bullet point [that&#039;s the second to last one, Billy-Bob] changed from ‘Security Management Information System (SMIS)’to ‘Information Security Management System (ISMS)’ [shades of the Peoples Front of Judea]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/493#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/66">Service Design</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/79">Inconsistent between books</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/111">confirmed in BOK database</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/493</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">493 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>SD P33 Figure 3.6</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/489</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;SD P33 3.6.2 Designing supporting systems…&lt;br /&gt;
In Figure 3.6, ‘Service Knowledge Management System’ was added to top of database shape containing the Service Portfolio&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Source ISEB &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/487&quot; title=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/487&quot;&gt;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/487&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/489#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/66">Service Design</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/77">Typographical</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/111">confirmed in BOK database</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/489</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">489 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>SD p145 Figure 4.27 Security control - It is shown as &#039;Direction&#039; - instead of &#039;Detection&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/431</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Book: Service Design.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Section 4.6.5&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4.28: Security Controls for Threats and Incidents.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Controls just under the box &#039;Incident&#039;, are shown: &#039;Direction&#039; and &#039;Repression&#039;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These should have been &#039;Detection&#039; and &#039;Repression&#039;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For validating this, the explanation in the next page (page 146 in pdf version) can be referred to.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A clear typo - but since it is in the diagram - have seen even some coursewares showing the diagram as is.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/431#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/66">Service Design</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/77">Typographical</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/431</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 09:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>vinodka</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">431 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>External influences on solution design </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/349</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Figure 3.14 External influences on solution design on page 48 in the upper left portion of the diagram it should be ISO/IEC 20000 vice 2000&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/349#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/66">Service Design</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/77">Typographical</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/349</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mwalter</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">349 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>All books 2.2.1 repeats service definition</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/264</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;pure pedantry: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Chapter 2 is in all books (though with very subtle editorial differences).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2.2.1 the text at the start in a box defining a service is almost identical with the following paragraph - should have been edited?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/264#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/69">Continual Service Improvement</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/66">Service Design</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/68">Service Operation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/63">Service Strategy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/67">Service Transition</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/103">Editing</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/264</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 21:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">264 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
